
Duke Nukem 2011
Rated M for:

Duke Nukem Forever ESRB Rating
- Blood and Gore
- Intense Violence
- Strong Language
- Mature Humor
- Nudity
- Strong Sexual Content
- Use of Drugs and Alcohol
Seriously??! This is what we’ve been waiting – what is it now? – 10+ years for? It’s like Serious Sam meets Leisure Suit Larry. Why is it that developers feel compelled to put this sort of stuff in video games? Always pushing the boundaries of what our society deems reprehensible and morally corrupt, the entertainment industry seems hell bent in eroding our society’s morals. You don’t have to be religious to see what’s wrong in exposing kids to nude women and drugs. Some people will point out that the game isn’t for kids – after all, it’s been given a M rating; but that rating is for 17-year-olds and older.
It’s only been about 6 years since the “Hot Coffee” incident with Rockstar’s Grand Theft Auto series got their game pulled off shelves around the world (mainly America and Australia – it was already labeled adults only in Europe) for the discovery of an unlockable sex scene buried in their game and made available through a hack.
What ensued was a PR nightmare for Rockstar and an embarrassment to the ESRB no doubt – Senators got involved and tried to correct the problem with legislation. Parents were outraged, and Rockstar issued a “mandatory recall” of their games. You can read all about it on wikipedia, but it was a big mess – all over a sex scene that the developers had disabled.

Duke Nukem Forever footage from trailer
Now fast forward 6 years and the eagerly awaited Duke Nukem is on the cusp of being released. The game apparently has a rating of M 17+ but it has full frontal nudity in it. How did that work? What was going on in the offices of the ESRB that allowed that little slipperoo?
Technically, the game looks great – Gearbox has obviously lavished a lot of time and effort into making it top-notch; and Duke’s macho charisma and one-liners make him a memorable and likeable character. But morally, it’s a mess. I’ve been playing shooters since Doom 1, so I’m not a neophyte or pollyanna. But this game disturbs me – where do we draw the line? At what point do we as individuals say “this far and no further?” Or do we just allow the entertainment and media industries to spoon feed us whatever they wish? Where are our morals, the basic lessons of right and wrong we should have been taught growing up?
It is my sincere hope that Gearbox will consider the impact of their content decisions and not become part of the media crowd that tries to make the world a little less moral with every passing game or movie. We are all better than this. As for the ESRB – their judgement is slipping. I am not convinced they are policing the industry like they should be. When Hot Coffee became public and the government threatened to take over 6 years ago, they told them “Let’s not do something hasty! We can and will do a better job.” Looks like it’s time for another re-eval.
I wanted to copy here the full rating summary from the ESRB for Duke Nukem Forever:
This is a first-person shooter in which players assume the role of Duke Nukem, an action hero who must save Earth from invading aliens. Players use pistols, rail guns, shotguns, explosives, and Duke’s bare hands to attack and kill the alien enemies. The majority of gameplay involves destroying these enemies in frenetic gun and laser battles in order to move on to the next section. Aliens are often decapitated or dismembered when hit, sending large splashes of blood across the ground, surrounding walls, and players’ screen. Some sequences depict more ‘over-the-top’ instances of violence: aliens getting stabbed in the head or impaled; a human soldier bursting into bloody gibs after being tossed through propeller blades. In one sequence, players have the ability to shoot human characters that are trapped in pod-like alien webbing; bodies explode into pieces upon impact. During the course of the game, players enter a strip-club level and view several topless dancers and receive lap dances. A couple of missions within this level require players to recover sex toys and pictures of topless women. A few sequences strongly imply sexual acts: two women appear to perform fellatio on the central character (e.g., raising their heads from his lap)—though there is no actual depiction of the sex act; Duke moans and leans up against the wall of a bathroom stall (furnished with a hole)—it is implied that a sex act (not depicted) occurs. The game also contains several sexual references and innuendo in the dialogue (e.g., ‘I have hungry—you have big egg ro’ for me, Duke,’ ‘If you supply the dancing, I’ll supply the pole,’ and ‘I’ll need something naughty to play with.’). Duke’s comments range from jokes about colon cleansing to several one-liners about sex and female body parts. Bathroom humor includes the ability to urinate in toilets or urinals and/or pick up feces from toilets and throw it against walls. Players can use both steroid pills and beer as power-ups; when beer is consumed, the screen temporarily blurs. The words ‘f**k,’ ‘sh*t,’ ‘c*ck,’ and ‘a*shole’ appear in dialogue and on-screen text.

Alyx Vance, Half Life 2 heroine
People like to vicariously role-play actions and behaviors they would never do in real life but secretly would love to do: In the Grand Theft Auto series players can hijack cars, murder other people in a grotesque variety of ways, and carry out various heinous acts, any of which would land them in jail. I’ve played it and I can say: role playing a mobster is great fun.
In Duke Nukem Forever, players get to take on the persona of Duke Nukem, who is basically a mountain of a man who shoots oversized guns, uses vulgar language at every opportunity, and is the ultimate womanizer. I can see the draw for any guy out there to this character – who doesn’t want to be the biggest guy/chick magnet on the block? Additionally, it’s been said that every man at some level believes he is a low-level super hero. Inside us all, we desire to save the day, rescue a damsel in distress, and be hailed as a hero.
But do we accomplish this goal – of being great – by looking at pornography (the nudity in Duke Nukem and its crass treatment of women)? There is not one redeeming quality to the degrading of women in any way. Sure there have been “babes” in games for decades – and I’m not talking about Princess Peach (Mario). The list of game babes is huge and some are more memorable than others (Laura Croft, Tomb Raider; Alyx, Half Life 2). And yes some games have stretched the lines of propriety (Ritual Entertainment’s Elexis Sinclair and Gearbox’s Moxxy), and while that is disturbing, I believe DNF has gone too far. Let’s dial it back, guys – enough is enough.

Elexis Sinclair